Canada’s Terrestrial Ecozones in 3D: A Layered Spatial Model

Geovisualization Project Assignment, Toronto Metropolitan University, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, SA8905 – Cartography and Geovisualization, Fall 2025

By Payton Meilleur

Exploring Canada’s Ecozones From Coast to Coast

Canada is one of the most ecologically diverse countries in the world, spanning Arctic glaciers, dense boreal forests, sweeping prairie grasslands, temperate rainforests, wetlands, mountain systems, and coastal environments. These contrasting landscapes are organized into 15 terrestrial ecozones, each defined by shared patterns of climate, vegetation, soil, geology, and wildlife. Understanding these long-established ecological regions offers a meaningful way to appreciate Canada’s natural geography, and provides a foundation for environmental planning, conservation, and education.

For this project, I set out to create a three-dimensional, tactile model of Canada’s ecozones using layered physical materials. The goal was to translate geographic data into a physical form, showing how soil, bedrock, and land cover differ across the country. This model is accompanied by a digital mapping component completed in ArcGIS Pro, which helped guide the design, structure, and material choices for each ecozone.

This blog post outlines the context behind Canada’s ecozones, the datasets used to build the maps, and the process of turning digital ecological information into a physical, layered 3D model using natural and recycled materials.

Understanding the Terrestrail Ecozones

Ecozones form the broadest unit of the Ecological Framework of Canada, a national classification system used to organize environments with similar ecological processes, evolutionary history, and dominant biophysical conditions. Rather than describing individual landscapes, ecozones function as large-scale spatial units that group Canada’s terrain into major ecological patterns such as the Arctic, Cordillera, Plains, Shield, and Maritime regions. These zones reflect long-term interactions between climate, soils, landforms, vegetation, and geological history, and serve as a foundation for national-level environmental monitoring, conservation planning, and spatial data analysis.

Within this framework, datasets such as bedrock geology, soil order, and land cover provide further ecological detail. Bedrock influences surface form and drainage; soil orders reflect dominant pedogenic processes; and land cover shows the distribution of vegetation and surface characteristics. Together, these national spatial datasets support a deeper understanding of how ecological conditions vary across the country, and they informed both the digital mapping and the material choices used in my 3D physical model.

To interpret Canada’s ecozones more clearly, it is helpful to break down their naming structure. Each ecozone name combines an ecological prefix with a physiographic suffix, and these two components together describe the zone’s overall character.

  • The Zone Type describes the ecological/climatic zone
  • The Physiographic Region Type describes the physiographic region or geological province
Zone Type MeaningEnvironmental Traits
ArcticHigh-latitude polar regionTundra, permafrost, cold/dry climate, sparse vegetation
TaigaSubarctic transitional forestSparse trees, stunted conifers, cold winters, thin soils
BorealNorthern coniferous forestDense spruce–fir–pine forests, wetlands, glacial terrain
PrairiesGrassland lowlandsTemperate climate, fertile soils, agriculture, open plains
MixedwoodTransition between deciduous & coniferous forestMixed forest canopy, deeper soils, agriculture + forest
PacificWest Coast ecological regionMaritime climate, temperate rainforest, high precipitation
AtlanticEast Coast ecological regionMaritime climate, mixed forest, coastal influence
HudsonHudson Bay lowlandsPeatlands, poor drainage, cold climate, organic soils
Physiographic Region TypeMeaningLandscape Traits
CordilleraMountain systems and high relief regionsSteep terrain, alpine climate zones, variable soils
ShieldPrecambrian bedrock of the Canadian ShieldExposed rock, thin soils, many lakes, glacial features
PlainsLowland interior plainsSedimentary bedrock, rolling terrain, thicker soils
MaritimeCoastal lowlands and mixed forestOcean-influenced climate, forested lowlands
Figure 1. The Terrestrial Ecozones of Canada. Retrived from Statistics Canada (2021).

Digital Methods: Building the Ecological Layers in ArcGIS Pro

To guide the design of the 3D model, I assembled a set of national-scale spatial datasets representing the major ecological layers of Canada’s terrestrial environment. These included the ecozone boundaries, 2020 land cover, soil order, and bedrock lithology, all accessed through the Government of Canada’s Open Data portal. Each dataset was projected into NAD83 / Canada Albers Equal Area Conic, the recommended projection for ecological and continental analyses.

The ecozone boundaries were used as the spatial framework into which all other layers were integrated. The land cover raster provided information on surface vegetation and terrain characteristics, while the soil order dataset showed how pedogenic processes vary across the country. Bedrock lithology offered a deeper geological layer, distinguishing igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary provinces across Canada’s major physiographic regions.

In ArcGIS Pro, each raster dataset was clipped to the ecozone boundaries to isolate the surface conditions, soil regimes, and bedrock types present within each zone. This process produced a series of layered maps that showed how ecological characteristics vary across Canada at the ecozone scale. By visualizing these datasets together (land cover on top of soil order and bedrock geology) it became possible to examine the vertical ecological structure of each ecozone and understand the relationships between surface patterns, subsurface materials, and underlying geological formations. These GIS outputs were paired with descriptive information from the Ecological Framework of Canada (ecozones.ca), which provides qualitative detail about the depth of soils, dominant surface features, and the broader geomorphological context of each ecozone. Together, these resources informed the conceptual structure of the 3D model developed in the next stage of the project.

Figure 2. Reference map of Canada’s 15 terrestrial ecozones.
Figure 3. Map showing 2020 land cover classifications across Canada’s ecozones.
Figure 4. Map showing the distribution of soil orders within Canada’s ecozones.
Figure 5. Map showing the distribution of Canada’s major bedrock types, overlaid with ecozone boundaries.

Physical Methods: Constructing the 3D Ecozone Model

The goal of the physical model was to translate Canada’s ecological geography into a tactile, layered form that makes the structure of each ecozone visible and intuitive. While the digital maps reveal patterns across the landscape, the 3D model emphasizes how surface cover, soil, and bedrock stack vertically to shape ecological conditions. Each ecozone was built as an individual “bin” shaped roughly to its boundary, with a transparent side panel exposing the internal layers—bedrock at the base, soil in the middle, and surface materials on top. The thickness, texture, and colour of these layers were informed by the Ecological Framework of Canada, which outlines typical soil profiles, surficial materials, and geological contexts within each ecozone, and by the national spatial datasets processed in ArcGIS Pro. Together, these sources guided the construction of bins that physically represent the vertical ecological structure underlying Canada’s major terrestrial regions.

Materials Used

Structural Components (See Figure 6.)

  • Base structure: tri-fold presentation board
  • Bin walls: recycled cardboard boxes
  • Viewing window: broken transparent umbrella
  • Filling: repurposed pillow stuffing, recycled tissue paper
  • Adhesives: hot glue gun, tacky glue, spray glue, duct tape
  • Tools: scissors, exacto-knife

Layered Ecological Materials (See Figure 7.)

  • Bedrock: collected rocks of various colours, collected sea glass shards, small crystals
  • Soil: collected soil, bagged gardening soil, sand, coarse cat litter
  • Permafrost: leftover faux snow from holiday decorations

Surface Features and Detailing (See Figure 8.)

  • Land cover base: thrifted felt in various colours (to match each surface cover type)
  • Surface cover:
    – Forested areas: dried moss, forest floor craft mat, artificial grass powder
    – Agricultural areas: ‘fallen leaves’ craft mat, shredded brown string
    – Snowed areas: thrifted quilt batting
    – Wetlands/lakes: coloured UV resin
  • Mountains: painted tinfoil
  • Trees and shrubs:
    – Redwood forest: collected dried Red Twig Dogwood branches and cedar leaves
    – Deciduous forest: toothpicks with painted cotton-ball canopies
    – Coniferous forest: dried pine needles, repurposed plastic branches
    – Berries: collected styrofoam berries
  • Colouring Materials: thrifted black, white, blue, and red acryllic paint
Figure 6. Structural materials used to build the ecozone bins and base.
Figure 7. Subsurface materials representing bedrock, soil, and permafrost layers.
Figure 8. Surface cover and vegetation materials used to detail each ecozone.

Constructing the 3-D Ecozone Model

The following steps summarize the process of building the 3D ecozone bins, from shaping the structures to layering bedrock, soil, and surface materials.

Step 1. Trace and Cut the Ecozone Shapes

Ecozone boundaries were exported from ArcGIS Pro, printed, and used as templates for the physical model. The outlines were traced onto paper and cut out to establish the footprint of each bin. In addition, the overall outline of Canada was cut into the top layer of the tri-fold presentation board to create a recessed “frame” where the ecozone bins would sit securely during assembly.

Step 2. Cut the Cardboard Bases and Wall Pieces

Using the paper templates from Step 1, each ecozone boundary was traced onto recycled cardboard and cut out to form a sturdy base. Additional cardboard strips were measured to a uniform height of 3.5 inches and cut to length so they could later be attached as the vertical walls for each bin.

Step 3. Build the Bin Walls and Viewing Windows

The cardboard wall strips were bent and glued along the perimeter of each base using hot glue, then reinforced with duct tape to create durable, open-top bins. A rectangular cut-out was made on one side of each bin, and clear plastic panels cut from a broken transparent umbrella were glued in place to form viewing windows for the internal layers.

Step 4. Test-Fit the Bins in the Presentation Board Frame

Once all bins were constructed, they were placed into the recessed outline cut into the tri-fold presentation board to test the overall fit. This dry run helped ensure the ecozones aligned properly with the national outline. Minor adjustments to edge trimming and bin alignment were made where necessary before moving on to internal layering.

Step 5. Add Internal Support Layers

Before adding the ecological materials, each bin received an internal support base. Pillow stuffing, crumpled tissue paper, and shaped tinfoil were added as lightweight filler to elevate the inner floor where needed and provide structure for the bedrock, soil, and surface layers applied in Step 6.

Step 6. Fill the Bins with Bedrock and Soil Layers

Each bin was filled just high enough for the internal layers to be visible through the viewing window. Materials such as rocks, gravel, sand, soil, and artificial snow were added to represent the approximate bedrock and soil conditions characteristic of each ecozone. These layers created the vertical structure that would support the surface land cover added later.

Step 7. Paint the Exterior of the Bins

After all bins were filled, their outer surfaces were painted black to create a cohesive and visually unified appearance. This step helped the ecozones read as a single model while keeping the focus on the internal layers and surface textures.

Step 8. Adding the Land Cover Surface

Once the bins were painted, each one was topped with a layer of felt in a colour chosen to match its dominant land cover type. The felt provided a level, uniform base for adding surface materials. On top of this foundation, land-cover textures (such as forest-floor matting, moss, agricultural matting, snow batting, etc.) were added to represent the ecological characteristics of each ecozone

Step 9. Adding Landscape Features

Landscape features were added to give each ecozone its characteristic surface form. Mountains were shaped from tinfoil and painted for texture, while natural and repurposed materials were trimmed into trees, shrubs, and ground vegetation. Lakes and wetlands were created by curing coloured UV resin. Powdered grass, moss, faux snow, and all other surface elements were secured in place using a combination of tacky glue, spray adhesive, and hot glue, ensuring the finished landscapes were stable and cohesive across each bin.

Step 10. Assembling the 3D Model

Once all surface detailing was complete, the ecozone bins were placed back into the presentation-board base. Each piece was adjusted to ensure that the boundaries aligned cleanly, the bins fit together without gaps, and the visible land cover on the surface and sides accurately reflected the geographic and ecological patterns shown in the digital maps. This final assembly brought the full three-dimensional model together as an integrated representation of Canada’s terrestrial ecozones.

Conclusion

This project brought together digital mapping, ecological research, and hands-on model building to translate national-scale environmental data into a tangible format. By combining GIS analysis with layered physical materials, the model highlights how geology, soils, and surface cover interact to shape Canada’s major ecological regions. Although simplified, the final product offers an accessible way to visualize the structure of the Canadian Ecological Framework’s Terrestrial Ecozones and demonstrates how spatial data can be reinterpreted through creative, tactile design.

The Carolinian Zone: Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) Plant Species Common in the Carolinian Zone

Geovis Project Assignment, TMU Geography, SA8905, Fall 2025

By: Danielle Lacka

INTRODUCTION:

Hello readers!

For my geo-visualization project, I wanted to weave together stories of land, knowledge, and technology through a Métis lens. My project, “Mapping Métis Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK): Where TEK Plant Species Are Found in the Carolinian Zone,” became a way to visualize how cultural knowledge and ecology intersect across southern Ontario’s most biodiverse landscape.

Inspired by the storytelling traditions that shape how knowledge is shared, I used ArcGIS StoryMaps to build an interactive narrative that brings TEK plant species to life on the map.

This project is more than just a map—it’s a story about connection, care, and the living relationships between people and the environment. Through digital tools and mapping in ArcGIS Pro, I aimed to highlight how Métis TEK continues to grow and adapt in today’s technological world.

See the finished story map here:

Join me as I walk through how I created this project where data meets story, and where land, plants, and knowledge come together on the screen.

PROJECT BACKGROUND:

In 2010, the Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO) released the Southern Ontario Métis Traditional Plant Use Study, the first of its kind to document Métis traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) related to plant and vegetation use in southern Ontario (Métis Nation of Ontario, 2010). The study, supported by Ontario Power Generation (OPG), was developed through collaboration with Métis Elders, traditional resource users, and community councils in the Northumberland, Oshawa, and Durham regions. It highlights Métis-specific traditional and medicinal practices that differ from those of neighbouring First Nations, while also recording environmental changes in southern Ontario and their effects on Métis relationships with plant life.

Since there are already extensive records documenting the plant species found across the Carolinian Zone, this project focuses on connecting those existing data sources with Métis Traditional Ecological Knowledge, revealing where cultural and ecological landscapes overlap and how they continue to shape our understanding of place. Not all species mentioned in the study are included in this storymap as some species mentioned were not found in the Carolinian Zone List of Vascular Plants by Michael J. Oldham. The video found at the end of this story is shared by the Métis Nation of Ontario as part of the Southern Ontario Métis Traditional Plant Use Study (2010). It is included to support the geovisualization of plant knowledge and landscapes in southern Ontario. The teachings and knowledge remain the intellectual and cultural property of the Métis Nation of Ontario and are presented with respect for community protocols, including acknowledging the Métis Nation of Ontario as the knowledge holders, not reproducing or claiming the teachings, and using them solely for the purposes of geovisualization and awareness in this project.

This foundational research of the MNO represents an important step in recognizing and protecting Métis ecological knowledge and cultural practices, ensuring they are considered in environmental assessments and future land-use decisions. Visualizing this knowledge on a map helps bring these relationships to life and helps in connecting traditional teachings to place, showing how Métis plant use patterns are tied to specific landscapes, and making this knowledge accessible in a meaningful, spatial way.

Let’s get started on how this project was built.

THE GEOVISUALIZATION PRODUCT:

The data that was used to build this StoryMap is as follows:

The software that was used to create this StoryMap is as follows:

  • ArcGIS StoryMaps to put the story together
  • ArcGIS Pro to build the map for the story
  • Microsoft Excel to build the dataset

Now that we have all the tools and data we need we can get started on building the project.

STEPS:

  1. Make your dataset: we have 2 sets of data and it is easier when everything is in one place. This requires some manual labour of reading and searching the data to find out what plants mentioned in the MNO’s study are found within the Carolinian zone and what census divisions they could *commonly be found in. 

*NOTE: I made this project based on the definition of status common to be found in the Carolinian zone and CDs as there were many different status definitions in Oldham’s data, but I wanted to connect these datasets based on the definition of being commonly found instead of other definitions (rare, uncommon, no status, etc.) (Oldham, 2017).

In order to make this new dataset I used Excel to hold the columns: Plant Name, Scientific Name, Comments, and Métis use of description from the MNO’s study, as well as a column called “Common Status” to hold the CDs these species were commonly found in. 

  1. Fill your dataset: Now that the dataset is set up, data can be put into it. I brought the list of species as well as the rest of the columns mentioned from the MNO’s plant use study into their respective columns: 

I included the comments column as this is important context to include to ensure that using this data was in its whole and told the whole story of this dataset rather than bits and pieces.

Once the base data is in the sheet we can start locating their common status within the Carolinian zone using Oldham’s data records.

What I did was search each species mentioned in the MNO plant use study within Oldham’s dataset. Then if the species matched records in the dataset I would include the CD’s name in the Common Status column.

Once the entire species list has been searched the data collection step is complete and we can move onto the next step.

  1. Bring in your map layers: Open ArcGIS Pro and create a new project. I changed my basemap layer to better match the theme of this to Imagery Hybrid. Add in the Ontario Geohub Shapefile (the red outline). Rename this if you want as it is pretty well named already. Next bring in the Stats Canada CD shapefile. 
  1. Refine your map layers: First I selected only 7E (The Carolinian Zone), using the select by attribute option: 

Then you filter based on this ecoregion: 

Then once you run the selection you can export as a new layer with only the Carolinian Zone.

Next I applied the CD layer and clipped it to the exported Carolinian zone layer using the clip feature:

This will only show the CDs that lie within the Carolinian Zone. Now you will add the pdf layer. We need to use this pdf to draw the boundary line for 7E4 which is an eco-district that includes several CDs. With the pdf layer selected, click Imagery and Georeference:

Next, you can right click on the layer and click zoom to layer. 

Then in the georeferencing tab, click move and the pdf should show up to move around the map.

Now, you can use the three options (in the figure above) to as best you can overlay the pdf to align with the map to look something like this:

Once it is fit you can draw the boundary line on the clipped CD layer with create layer 

If it is too tricky to see beyond the pdf you can change the transparency to make it easier:

Now you can draw the boundary. Once that is complete click save, then export the layer drawn as a new layer. Now you can change the symbology for colour to show the distinctive divisions in the Ecozone. 

For the labels, I added a new column in the Eco-divisions layer called Short for the abbreviations of the districts for a better look. I manually entered in the abbreviations for the CDs similar to how Oldham did it in his map.

Now you should have something like this:

Now that the map is completed, we can start on making the storymap.

  1. Make the storymap

I started by writing up the text for how I wanted the story map to flow in google docs, making an introduction and providing some background context: such as the data I used, why the work done by the MNO is important for Indigenous people and the environment, and what I hope the project achieves. I wrote up where I wanted to put the maps, and what images and plant knowledge tables.

I applied this plan to the story map and had to turn the map I made in ArcGIS into a web map in order to access it in story map. (You can choose to make the map in ArcGIS Online to avoid this).

I also found some awesome 3-D models of some of the species mentioned from a site called Sketch fab which I thought was super cool to be able to visualize!

Then you have created a story map learning about the Carolinian Zone and what Métis TEK plant species are commonly found and used from here!

CONCLUSIONS/LIMITATIONS:

One of the key limitations of this project is that some zones lacked common status plant species as described in the MNO Plant Use Study, resulting in no species being listed for those areas. This absence may reflect gaps in documentation rather than a true lack of plant use, pointing to the need for more comprehensive and localized research.

The uneven distribution of documented plant species across zones underscores both the complexity of Métis plant relationships and the urgency of further study. By embracing these limitations as a call to action, we affirm the value of Indigenous knowledge systems and encourage broader learning about the interdependence between people and place.

REFERENCES

Carolinian Canada Coalition. (2007). Caring for nature in Brant: Landowner action in Carolinian Canada [Fact sheet]. https://caroliniancanada.ca/sites/default/files/File%20Depository/Library/factsheets/Brant_Factsheet_Final.pdf 

Carolinian Canada Coalition. (2007). Caring for nature in Elgin: Landowner action in Carolinian Canada [Fact sheet]. https://caroliniancanada.ca/sites/default/files/File%20Depository/Library/factsheets/Elgin_Factsheet_Final.pdf 

Carolinian Canada Coalition. (2007). Caring for nature in Essex: Landowner action in Carolinian Canada [Fact sheet]. https://caroliniancanada.ca/sites/default/files/File%20Depository/Library/factsheets/Essex_Factsheet_Final.pdf 

Carolinian Canada Coalition. (2007). Caring for nature in Haldimand: Landowner action in Carolinian Canada [Fact sheet]. https://caroliniancanada.ca/sites/default/files/File%20Depository/Library/factsheets/Haldimand_Factsheet_Final.pdf 

Carolinian Canada Coalition. (2007). Caring for nature in Hamilton: Landowner action in Carolinian Canada [Fact sheet]. https://caroliniancanada.ca/sites/default/files/File%20Depository/Library/factsheets/Hamilton_Factsheet_Final.pdf 

Carolinian Canada Coalition. (2007). Caring for nature in Lambton: Landowner action in Carolinian Canada [Fact sheet]. https://caroliniancanada.ca/sites/default/files/File%20Depository/Library/factsheets/Lambton_Factsheet_Final.pdf 

Carolinian Canada Coalition. (2007). Caring for nature in Middlesex: Landowner action in Carolinian Canada [Fact sheet]. https://caroliniancanada.ca/sites/default/files/File%20Depository/Library/factsheets/Middlesex_Factsheet_Final.pdf 

Carolinian Canada Coalition. (2007). Caring for nature in Niagara: Landowner action in Carolinian Canada [Fact sheet]. https://caroliniancanada.ca/sites/default/files/File%20Depository/Library/factsheets/Niagara_Factsheet_Final.pdf 

Carolinian Canada Coalition. (2007). Caring for nature in Oxford: Landowner action in Carolinian Canada [Fact sheet]. https://caroliniancanada.ca/sites/default/files/File%20Depository/Library/factsheets/Oxford_Factsheet_Final.pdf 

Chatham-Kent Home. (2024, November 28). Agriculture & Agri-Food. https://www.chatham-kent.ca/EconomicDevelopment/invest/invest/Pages/Agriculture.aspx 

Métis Nation of Ontario. (2010). Traditional ecological knowledge study: Southern Ontario Métis traditional plant use [PDF]. Métis Nation of Ontario. https://www.metisnation.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/so_on_tek_darlington_report.pdf 

Oldham, Michael. (2017). List of the Vascular Plants of Ontario’s Carolinian Zone (Ecoregion 7E). Carolinian Canada. 10.13140/RG.2.2.34637.33764.